McCallister v. McCallister, No. 49D12-1606-DR-19232, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct....
Although under federal law the court could not order husband to change the beneficiary on his Air Force Survivor Benefit Plan as required by the Marital Settlement Agreement, the trial court can...
View ArticlePflugh v. Indianapolis Historic Preservation Comm’n, No. 18A-PL-351, __...
Neighbor lacks standing to challenge a rezoning decision unless he can show pecuniary or special injury.
View ArticleC.S. v. State, No. 18A-JV-862, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 19, 2018).
Ind. Code § 31-37-18-1.3 requires that a delinquent child be given notice of and an opportunity to be heard during a dispositional or modification hearing; however, the child is not required to be...
View ArticleHotep-El v. State, No. 18A-CR-477, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 13, 2018).
The trial court properly terminated self-representation of a sovereign citizen based on its conclusion that he sought to use the courtroom for deliberate disruption of the proceedings.
View ArticleStewart v. McCray, No. 19A-PL-149, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 11, 2019).
Trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction in a dispute over church’s leadership.
View ArticleMcGowen v. Montes, No. 19A-CT-1707, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 6, 2020).
Defendant was rendering emergency care, for purposes of the Good Samaritan Law, when he stopped his vehicle and offered to call 911.
View ArticleR.W. v. J.W., No. 19A-PO-2697, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 13, 2020).
The existence of an emergency order of protection issued in Illinois in favor of one party did not require the trial court to transfer the other party’s Indiana petition for protective order to...
View ArticleIn the Matter of the Change of Gender Identification of A.B., No....
Parents have authority to petition to change the gender marker of their child on the child’s birth certificate. The appropriate standard is whether the change is in the child’s best interests.
View ArticleState v. Barnett, No. 20A-CR-2144, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 25, 2021).
The trial court did not abuse its discretion by giving preclusive effect to the Marion County Probate Court’s 2012 age-change order and the March 7, 2017, order reaffirming same, thus preventing the...
View ArticleMiller v. State, No. 21A-CR-2315, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 1, 2021).
Bifurcation of unlawful possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon (SVF) charges serves the purpose of protecting a defendant’s right to the presumption of innocence and ensures a fair trial.
View Article
More Pages to Explore .....